facebook twitter instagram linkedin google youtube vimeo tumblr yelp rss email podcast phone blog search brokercheck brokercheck Play Pause
Markets Hit Records Amid Mixed Economic Signals Thumbnail

Markets Hit Records Amid Mixed Economic Signals

The S&P 500 gained 1.49% this week, closing at a new record high.

  • Labor markets remained strong with jobless claims falling to 217,000.
  • Manufacturing showed weakness as the Richmond Fed Index plunged to -20, indicating broad-based contraction across the Fifth District.
  • Housing markets struggled under elevated mortgage rates. Existing home sales dropped 2.7% to a nine-month low and home prices reached a record  $435,300. New home inventory surged to nearly 10 months of supply, shifting conditions toward buyers.
  • Durable goods orders fell 9.3% due to volatile aircraft orders, though core orders excluding transportation rose 0.2%. And the band played on.
  • The Federal Reserve meets July 29-30 with rates at 4.25-4.50%. One Fed governor called for immediate rate cuts, citing rates running too high.
  • Second-quarter earnings reports to date show mixed results across sectors, with technology companies receiving varied investor reactions to their spending and growth plans.

Markets continue reaching new highs despite mixed economic signals and uncertainty around trade policy and the timing of Federal Reserve policy.


Economy Watch

Tuesday
Richmond Fed Manufacturing Inde
x took a notable step backward in July, dropping to -20 from June's -8 reading—a much steeper decline than the -2 economists had expected. This marks five straight months of contraction for the Fifth District, which includes Maryland, North Carolina, Virginia, South Carolina, the District of Columbia, and most of West Virginia—collectively representing about 9% of our nation's economic output. The weakness was broad-based, with shipments, new orders, and employment all showing meaningful declines. New orders were particularly concerning, falling to -25, which suggests challenges may persist in the months ahead. The silver lining? Manufacturers remain cautiously optimistic about future conditions, with forward-looking indicators for shipments and orders showing improvement, even as employment expectations remain subdued.

Wednesday
Existing Home Sales
continue to face headwinds, as the latest data from the National Association of Realtors shows sales dropped 2.7% in June to 3.93 million units—a nine-month low that came in below what economists were expecting. While home prices hit yet another record for June at $435,300 (marking an incredible 24 straight months of year-over-year gains), the reality is that fewer people are able to participate in the market. Sales fell across most of the country, with the Northeast seeing the steepest decline at 8%. The culprit remains familiar: mortgage rates hovering around 6.75% are simply pricing out too many potential buyers. There is some encouraging news, though—inventory has improved to a 4.7-month supply, and first-time buyers are holding steady at 30% of all sales. NAR's Chief Economist Lawrence Yun believes we could see more activity if rates drop closer to 6% later this year, which would help bring those 160,000 additional renters into homeownership.

Thursday
New Home Sales
showed mixed signals in June, with the pace holding relatively steady at 627,000 homes on an annualized basis—just a slight tick up from May but still running about 7% behind last year's levels. What's particularly noteworthy is the growing inventory of available homes, which has climbed to nearly 10 months of supply. This represents a significant shift toward a buyer's market, giving purchasers more choices and negotiating power. We're also seeing some welcome relief on pricing, with the median new home price dropping to $401,800 in June—down from $422,700 in May and representing the most affordable new home prices we've seen in over a year. While elevated mortgage rates continue to keep many potential buyers on the sidelines, those who are actively shopping have considerably more options and pricing flexibility than they've enjoyed in recent years.

Friday
Durable Goods Orders
pulled back sharply in June, falling 9.3 percent to $311.8 billion after May's eye-popping 16.5 percent surge. While that decline sounds alarming, here's what really happened: the Boeing effect worked in reverse. Transportation equipment drove the decrease, plummeting $32.6 billion or 22.4 percent to $113.0 billion. Strip out those big-ticket transportation orders, and core durable goods actually edged up 0.2 percent—a much steadier picture of underlying manufacturing demand. This perfectly illustrates how aircraft orders can whipsaw these monthly numbers. We simply had fewer transportation orders in June than in May. Remember, a single wide-body plane costs $200-400 million, so the difference between a big aircraft order month and a quiet one can make the whole manufacturing sector appear to swing wildly. The real story is in that modest 0.2 percent core increase. It suggests businesses are still placing steady orders for machinery, computers, and other equipment—just not the billion-dollar aircraft that can dominate the headlines. Meanwhile, shipments actually rose 0.5 percent, showing manufacturers are still delivering goods and working through their backlog. So while the headline looks scary, the underlying manufacturing pulse remains relatively stable.


By The Numbers

Employment Indicators

Employment data helps gauge whether consumers have jobs and money to spend. Consumer spending accounts for more than 70% of GDP.

Indicator Current Value Status
Initial Claims for Unemployment 217,000 Stable
4-Week Average of Initial Claims 224,500 Stable
Continuing Claims 1.955M Stable
Unemployment Rate 4.1% Stable

Note: Values above 250K for the 4-Week Average, combined with rising unemployment, could signal a weakening economy.
Next unemployment report: August 1, 2025. Source: Department of Labor

Economic Growth (Real GDP)

Period Growth Rate Status
Q3 2024 2.8% Positive
Q4 2024 2.4% Slowing
Q1 2025 -0.5% Contraction - Consider the average of Q1 & Q2 due to tariff distortions = 0.95%
Q2 2025 (est.) 2.4% Recovery - Consider the average of Q1 & Q2 due to tariff distortions = 0.95%

GDP growth provides a broad measure of overall economic activity and signals whether the economy is expanding or contracting.
Source: Bureau of Economic Analysis; Estimate from Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta

Inflation Measures (CPI Year-over-Year)

Month Rate Trend
August 2.53% Improving
September 2.44% Improving
October 2.60% Deteriorating
November 2.75% Deteriorating
December 2.89% Deteriorating
January 2025 3.00% Deteriorating
February 2.82% Improving
March 2.39% Improving
April 2.31% Improving
May 2.35% Deteriorating
June 2.67% Deteriorating
July (est.) 2.73% Deteriorating

Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics; May estimate from Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland

Note: While inflation has moderated, new tariffs may cause temporary spikes in monthly data. Once tariffs have been in place for a full year, inflation should revert closer to the underlying trend.

Interest Rate Outlook

Current Fed Funds Rate: 4.25-4.50%

Expected Cut Date Amount Projected Rate After Cut
September 17, 2025 0.25% 4.00-4.25%
December 10, 2025 0.25% 3.75-4.00%
March 18, 2026 0.25% 3.50-3.75%
July 29, 2026 0.25% 3.25-3.50%

Note: Changes in monetary policy expectations reflect market participants' views on how the Fed will likely respond to shifts in inflation or employment.
Source: CME FedWatch Tool

Corporate Earnings Outlook (S&P 500 Estimates for 2025)

Date 2025 Earnings Estimate 2026 Earnings Estimate Trend
June 28, 2024 $276.29

Sept 30, 2024 $274.73
Deteriorating
Dec 31, 2024 $271.25
Deteriorating
Mar 31, 2025 $266.39 $304.89 Deteriorating
June 30, 2025 $255.29 $295.32 Deteriorating
Current $255.59 $299.25 Stabalizing

Source: S&P Dow Jones Indices

Market Valuation

Metric Value Assessment
S&P 500 P/E ratio on 2025 / 2026 estimated earnings 25 Times Earnings / 21.4 Times Earnings Expensive
Historical P/E (pre-1980) 14.0
Historical P/E (post-1980) 19.0

Note: Equity valuations remain expensive by historical standards


Disclosure:

This material is provided by Todd Van Der Meid, MBA, CFP®, through Rhino Wealth Management, Inc., a Registered Investment Adviser, solely for informational purposes. It is not intended as investment, tax, legal, or accounting advice. Investors should consult qualified professionals before making financial decisions.

Opinions expressed herein are general in nature and not tailored to individual circumstances. Investment strategies discussed may not be suitable for every investor. All investments carry risk, including possible loss of principal, and past performance does not guarantee future results. No investment strategy or risk management technique ensures profit or eliminates risk in all market conditions.

Investments in foreign or emerging markets involve additional risks, such as currency fluctuations, geopolitical instability, and varying accounting standards. Sector-specific investments can be more volatile due to their concentrated nature. References to indexes are for illustrative purposes; indexes are unmanaged, cannot be invested into directly, and their performance does not reflect fees, expenses, or sales charges. Index performance is not indicative of specific investment performance.

Economic forecasts and forward-looking statements reflect current views and assumptions and are subject to change. Actual results may vary materially due to market or other conditions. There is no obligation to update forward-looking information.

Information presented herein comes from reliable third-party sources but is not guaranteed for accuracy or completeness. Rhino Wealth Management, Inc. disclaims liability for errors or omissions. Portions of this content may be generated using advanced analytical tools, including artificial intelligence, and all such content has been reviewed and validated by Todd Van Der Meid, MBA, CFP®, using proprietary quality-control measures.

Rhino Wealth Management, Inc. does not directly hold securities; however, securities mentioned may be included within recommended portfolio models or held by clients. Please refer to our Form ADV for additional details regarding potential conflicts of interest.